Menu
e-lo
  • Home
    • Tech
    • Inspiration and about
  • Database
    • T-SQL
    • SQL Server quick
    • SQL server docs
    • MySql quick sheet
    • Postgre
    • InfluxDB
  • Programming
    • Automating the boring stuff
    • Python 101
    • Python Docs
    • Python Logging
    • cSharp Overview
    • Powershell Latest
    • Powershell 4 lang ref
  • Linux
    • Top CMD’s
    • Useful CMD Linux
    • ss64 Linux
    • Ubuntu
    • 30 things Ubuntu 18.04
  • Azure
    • AZ-104-MS Azure Administrator 101 quick ref
    • ARM Docs
    • ARM Tutorial
    • Azure PS ref
    • Azure CLI ref
    • Deployment scripts (intern/extern)
    • ARM Quickstart
    • ARM templates 4h
  • AzAdm
    • AD 101
    • Governance and Compliance 102
    • Administration 103
    • Virtual Networking 104
    • Storage 107 (With table (NoSQL and more))
    • Virtual Machines 108
    • Azure Virtual Machines 101
    • Monitor VM (and market)
  • Zen
    • Not thinking about anything is Zen
e-lo

Leviathan Thomas Hobbes

Posted on August 8, 2018August 8, 2018 by espenk

http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/leviathan/summary/

Leviathan rigorously argues that civil peace and social unity are best achieved by the establishment of a commonwealth through social contract. Hobbes’s ideal commonwealth is ruled by a sovereign power responsible for protecting the security of the commonwealth and granted absolute authority to ensure the common defense. In his introduction, Hobbes describes this commonwealth as an “artificial person” and as a body politic that mimics the human body.

The frontispiece to the first edition of Leviathan, which Hobbes helped design, portrays the commonwealth as a gigantic human form built out of the bodies of its citizens, the sovereign as its head. Hobbes calls this figure the “Leviathan,” a word derived from the Hebrew for “sea monster” and the name of a monstrous sea creature appearing in the Bible; the image constitutes the definitive metaphor for Hobbes’s perfect government. His text attempts to prove the necessity of the Leviathan for preserving peace and preventing civil war.

 

Leviathan is divided into four books: “Of Man,” “Of Common-wealth,” “Of a Christian Common-wealth,” and “Of the Kingdome of Darknesse.” Book I contains the philosophical framework for the entire text, while the remaining books simply extend and elaborate the arguments presented in the initial chapters. Consequently, Book I is given the most attention in the detailed summaries that follow. Hobbes begins his text by considering the elementary motions of matter, arguing that every aspect of human nature can be deduced from materialist principles. Hobbes depicts the natural condition of mankind–known as the state of nature–as inherently violent and awash with fear. The state of nature is the “war of every man against every man,” in which people constantly seek to destroy one another. This state is so horrible that human beings naturally seek peace, and the best way to achieve peace is to construct the Leviathan through social contract.

Book II details the process of erecting the Leviathan, outlines the rights of sovereigns and subjects, and imagines the legislative and civil mechanics of the commonwealth. Book III concerns the compatibility of Christian doctrine with Hobbesian philosophy and the religious system of the Leviathan. Book IV engages in debunking false religious beliefs and arguing that the political implementation of the Leviathanic state is necessary to achieve a secure Christian commonwealth.

Hobbes’s philosophical method in Leviathan is modeled after a geometric proof, founded upon first principles and established definitions, and in which each step of argument makes conclusions based upon the previous step. Hobbes decided to create a philosophical method similar to the geometric proof after meeting Galileo on his extended travels in Europe during the 1630s. Observing that the conclusions derived by geometry are indisputable because each of constituent steps is indisputable in itself, Hobbes attempted to work out a similarly irrefutable philosophy in his writing of Leviathan.

https://www.iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/

The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) is best known for his political thought, and deservedly so. His vision of the world is strikingly original and still relevant to contemporary politics. His main concern is the problem of social and political order: how human beings can live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict. He poses stark alternatives: we should give our obedience to an unaccountable sovereign (a person or group empowered to decide every social and political issue). Otherwise what awaits us is a “state of nature” that closely resembles civil war – a situation of universal insecurity, where all have reason to fear violent death and where rewarding human cooperation is all but impossible.

Hobbes is the founding father of modern political philosophy. Directly or indirectly, he has set the terms of debate about the fundamentals of political life right into our own times. Few have liked his thesis, that the problems of political life mean that a society should accept an unaccountable sovereign as its sole political authority. Nonetheless, we still live in the world that Hobbes addressed head on: a world where human authority is something that requires justification, and is automatically accepted by few; a world where social and political inequality also appears questionable; and a world where religious authority faces significant dispute. We can put the matter in terms of the concern with equality and rights that Hobbes’s thought heralded: we live in a world where all human beings are supposed to have rights, that is, moral claims that protect their basic interests. But what or who determines what those rights are? And who will enforce them? In other words, who will exercise the most important political powers, when the basic assumption is that we all share the same entitlements?

Writing a few years after Hobbes, John Locke had definitely accepted the terms of debate Hobbes had laid down: how can human beings live together, when religious or traditional justifications of authority are no longer effective or persuasive? How is political authority justified and how far does it extend? In particular, are our political rulers properly as unlimited in their powers as Hobbes had suggested? And if they are not, what system of politics will ensure that they do not overstep the mark, do not trespass on the rights of their subjects?

RSS Azure

  • Azure and HITRUST publish shared responsibility matrix January 14, 2021

RSS Python

  • PEP 649: Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations Using Descriptors January 11, 2021

Cloud

ARM (7) azure (22) cmd (1) Django (4) Docker (1) e-lo (2) Flask (2) Github (9) Grafana (2) Information (1) Information Retrieval (11) JAVA (1) kivy (2) Kotlin (4) linux (11) mobile (2) Natural Language Prossesing (NLP) (2) Net.Core (1) Networking and Security (2) OPC (2) PEP8 (1) Philosophy (3) Python (41) Python Networking and Security (2) Reason (2) RMQ (2) Solr (11) Sql (10) VSC (1) Warframe (2) WMVARE (4) Zabbix (7)

Recent Posts

  • 2 TODO MS ARM Template 4h
  • TODO Cryptography with Python – Caesar Cipher
  • 3 TODO Udemy AZ-104 Microsoft Azure Administrator Exam Certification (Scott Duffy)
  • 1 TODO ARM Lab 104 MS (Deployment and more)
  • TODO Prerequisites for Azure administrators 101

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2021 e-lo | Powered by WordPress & Superb Themes